Mass. Enacts New Abortion Clinic Protections; Other States Mull 'Buffer Zones' Changes

July 31, 2014 — Massachusetts Gov. Deval Patrick (D) on Wednesday signed a bill (S 2281) into law to improve security surrounding the state's abortion clinics, the Boston Globe reports.

Lawmakers developed the legislation in response to a recent Supreme Court ruling that struck down the state's "buffer zone" law, which had barred protests within 35 feet of clinic entrances (Tietjen, Boston Globe, 7/30).

Law Details

The new law will give law enforcement personnel the authority to give dispersal orders if two or more protesters deliberately prevent patients or staff members from entering a clinic. Individuals who receive such orders will be required to stay at least 25 feet away from the clinic's entrance for up to eight hours.

The law also will prohibit protesters from interfering with vehicles approaching or leaving the area, as well as intimidating or harming people accessing the clinic. In addition, victims of such intimidation will be allowed to seek damages through civil action.

The measure also amends the state's current civil rights act to permit the state attorney general to pursue damages on behalf of individuals who have been blocked from accessing the clinics. The attorney general will be allowed to try to recover litigation costs and pursue civil penalties for individuals whose constitutional rights have been obstructed (Women's Health Policy Report, 7/24).


Patrick said, "I am incredibly proud to sign legislation that continues Massachusetts leadership in ensuring that women seeking to access reproductive health facilities can do so safely and without harassment, and that the employees of those facilities can arrive at work each day without fear of harm."

Planned Parenthood Federation of America President Cecile Richards said in a statement, "A woman shouldn't be forced to run through an onslaught of screaming, yelling and bullying to access health care." The new law helps "right the wrong done to women by the Supreme Court," she added (Boston Globe, 7/30).