July 18, 2014
"Massachusetts is Rushing Through Legislation To Fix the Supreme Court's Ruling on Buffer Zones," Culp-Ressler, Center for American Progress' "ThinkProgress": After the Supreme Court's decision to strike down Massachusetts' "buffer zone" law, "state lawmakers are rushing through new legislation to ensure that patients will still be able to safely enter clinics," Culp-Ressler writes. If signed into law, the new bill (S 2281) "would strengthen criminal penalties for certain disruptive behavior outside of abortion clinics," she explains. "Lawmakers are hoping the new legislation will strike the appropriate balance between patient safety and protesters' First Amendment rights," but "it's unlikely to please the individuals who brought down buffer zones," she adds (Culp-Ressler, "ThinkProgress," Center for American Progress, 7/17).
"States Prescribe Bad Medicine for Women Seeking Abortions," Emily Shugerman, Ms. Magazine blog: The day "before senators testified on behalf of a bill to protect women's health services, the National Partnership for Women & Families released a report detailing just how threatened these services are," Shugerman writes. Thirty-three states have at least one of the four types of abortion restrictions mentioned in the report -- biased counseling, mandatory delays, medication abortion restrictions and ultrasound requirements -- while 16 states have all four, she notes. "These laws require physicians to act according to state ideologies, not scientific evidence," Shugerman explains, concluding, "More importantly, they obscure the fact that reproductive health care should be treated like any other form of health care: an issue for the patient and her doctor, not for politicians" (Shugerman, Ms. Magazine blog, 7/16).
What others are saying about abortion restrictions:
~ "A Federal Pro-Choice Bill That Would Stem the Anti-Choice Tide in the States," Maya Dusenbery, Feministing.
~ "How To Get an Abortion in Texas," Jenny Kutner, Salon.