National Partnership for Women & Families

In the News

Planned Parenthood of Greater Texas Surgical Health Services et al. v. Abbott

Planned Parenthood of Greater Texas Surgical Health Services et al. v. Abbott

Challenge in federal court to a Texas law that imposes restrictions on medication abortion (including forcing physicians to administer medication in an outdated manner and requiring several in-person visits with a physician) and requires all physicians who perform abortions to have active admitting privileges at a hospital within 30 miles. The federal court enjoined enforcement of the provision requiring admitting privileges. The federal court enjoined enforcement of the medication abortion restrictions in cases where the physician determines that preservation of the life or health of the mother requires violating the provision; in all other cases, the medication abortion restrictions stand. The case was appealed to the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals. The 5th U.S. Circuit issued a stay of the federal court’s injunction of the admitting privileges requirement and narrowed the injunction regarding medication abortion, enjoining enforcement only if the patient is 50 to 63 days from her last menstrual period and the physician who is to perform the abortion determines that a surgical abortion is not a safe option due to the patient’s physical abnormality or preexisting condition. Current Status: A three-judge panel of the 5th Circuit unanimously ruled that the law is constitutional and can be enforced against providers. Providers who have applied for admitting privileges but who have not yet received a response are permitted to continue to provide abortion services until they receive a response. Plaintiffs have asked the full 5th Circuit to review and overturn the panel’s decision. (See the complaint here. See the injunction here. See the stay here. See the 5th Circuit's decision here.)