National Partnership for Women & Families

In the News

Stormans, Inc. v. Selecky

Stormans, Inc. v. Selecky

Federal court challenge to a Washington law that requires all pharmacies to carry and deliver prescription drugs, including emergency contraception. The law does not require individual pharmacists to deliver all drugs, but does require that all pharmacies fill any valid prescription. In November 2007, the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington temporarily enjoined the law. The 9th Circuit Court of Appeals vacated the injunction as overly broad and, based on an erroneous legal standard, sent the case back to the district court in July 2009. Following a rehearing in October 2009, the 9th Circuit again vacated the injunction and sent the case back to the district court. Before the district court reevaluated Plaintiffs’ temporary injunction request, the parties agreed to stay enforcement of the rules against the Plaintiffs while the state Board of Pharmacy considered amending the disputed rule. Ultimately, the board decided not to amend the rule, and the case proceeded to trial in the district court. In February 2012, the district court struck down the law as violating individual pharmacists’ right to religiously object to dispense emergency contraception. Current Status: The state appealed, and the case is pending before the 9th Circuit. (See the law here. See the July 2009 9th Circuit opinion here. See the October 2009 9th Circuit opinion here. See the 2012 district court opinion here.)